Hi all,
I have a quad boot Windows 7/ Mac OSX SL/ Backtrack/ Ubuntu working fine. I had to create a FAT partition to have my Firefox and Thunderbird profiles shared between the 4 OS.
So, it works, but I would like to know if my partitionning is good.
My hdd looks like this :
- sda1 : Ntfs Windows 7 (primary)
- sda2 : Hfs+ Snow Leopard (primary)
- sda3 : Ntfs Data (primary)
- sda4 : Extended
- sda5 : Fat32 Profiles Firefox & Thunderbird
- sda6 : Linux Swap
- sda7 : Reseirfs BT
- sda8 : Ext4 Ubuntu
I would like to know if it wouldn't be preferable to do that (2 primary for Win and MacOsX and 2 extended : 1 for Data and profiles and 1 for Linux) as follow :
- sda1 : Ntfs Win (primary)
- sda2 : Hfs+ Mac OsX (primary)
- sda3 : Extended
- sda4 : Ntfs Data
- sda5 : Fat32 Profiles firefox & thunderbird
- sda6 : Extended
- sda7 : Linux Swap
- sda8 : Reseirfs BT
- sda9 : Ext4 Ubuntu
However, even if it's working pretty good, putting my profiles on a FAT partition is certainly not a good thing regarding performances I know it is possible to make Snow Leopard writting on Ntfs partition (wich would avoid me to create a fat partition) but I still don't know if it's a good thing (have read so many contradictory articles, posts etc..) ?
Thank you for your help.
